Skip to content

Conversation

taion
Copy link
Contributor

@taion taion commented Jul 5, 2016

I was going through cleaning up old branches, and realized I still had this one sitting around.

Might as well check it in? I think it works.

From #3281, but looks like nobody's desperately in need of a release or anything.

@taion taion mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2016
@timdorr
Copy link
Member

timdorr commented Jul 5, 2016

@taion
Copy link
Contributor Author

taion commented Jul 5, 2016

I want to delete this branch but I don't want the code to go away forever 😛

e.g. even if I close this PR, I can use the PR to restore the branch! 😄

@ljharb
Copy link

ljharb commented Jul 5, 2016

This would be great to get a release of!

@taion
Copy link
Contributor Author

taion commented Jul 5, 2016

@ljharb Can you let me know if this code actually works though? I have no way of checking.

@ljharb
Copy link

ljharb commented Jul 5, 2016

I can only confirm it works secondhand atm, but by tomorrow I'll have first-hand confirmation :-)

@taion
Copy link
Contributor Author

taion commented Jul 5, 2016

Let me know. We said in #3281 that we were willing to release this, so might as well resolve this. (I really don't like having stale branches sitting around).

@timdorr You okay with making this change?

@taion
Copy link
Contributor Author

taion commented Jul 12, 2016

@ljharb ping

@ljharb
Copy link

ljharb commented Jul 12, 2016

@taion sorry; i've been traveling. I believe @goatslacker has verified that this works beautifully, but hopefully he can chime in :-)

@goatslacker
Copy link

@taion been traveling as well, yeah the change works well.

@taion
Copy link
Contributor Author

taion commented Jul 13, 2016

Any objections to releasing this?

@goatslacker
Copy link

No, go for it.

@taion
Copy link
Contributor Author

taion commented Jul 13, 2016

That was meant for @timdorr 😄

@timdorr
Copy link
Member

timdorr commented Jul 13, 2016

Sorry, having to swap out some production systems on the fly at work, so I've been running around like a chicken with my head cut off all day. Haven't even eaten lunch :(

LGTM. Worst case you can yank the version if it's bad.

@timdorr timdorr merged commit aaf8322 into remix-run:0.13.x Jul 13, 2016
@taion taion deleted the rr13-r15 branch July 13, 2016 20:28
@taion
Copy link
Contributor Author

taion commented Jul 13, 2016

Sorry! Just wanted to make sure your "but why?" was addressed. (:

@timdorr
Copy link
Member

timdorr commented Jul 13, 2016

It was more of a joking "why reach into the past" kind of thing. No worries :)

@lencioni
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your work on this!

@pixeldrew
Copy link

I can confirm that 13.4 worked without these changes on 15.4. This seems to be mostly fixes to the unit tests. There is one fix that needs to be addressed in the Link component that wasn't addressed, that is a warning for applying additional props onto the a tag in the render func.

@taion
Copy link
Contributor Author

taion commented Jul 18, 2016

Ugh okay this is released as v0.13.6. I vote that we should just delete the 0.13.x and say it's officially dead going forward, explicitly with no PRs or further releases.

@timdorr
Copy link
Member

timdorr commented Jul 18, 2016

Agreed. I'll go nuke it into oblivion now.

@ljharb
Copy link

ljharb commented Jul 18, 2016

Deleting published code is not so good :-( please don't do that, even if there won't be further releases.

@taion
Copy link
Contributor Author

taion commented Jul 18, 2016

Well, the former tip of the 0.13.x branch and the v0.13.6 tag are the same. I don't think we should delete the tag. No code is gone.

@timdorr
Copy link
Member

timdorr commented Jul 18, 2016

It's not deleted. Only the branch is gone. The tag remains: https://github.com/reactjs/react-router/tree/v0.13.6

@pixeldrew
Copy link

I believe they are talking about just deleting the branch not the tag.
Deleting the branch should be fine. A warning should be placed in the
Readme that 0.13 is not supported anymore and if someone wishes to support
the release they can branch from the tag.

Drew Foehn
[email protected]
+1 (347) 443 4031

@ljharb
Copy link

ljharb commented Jul 18, 2016

Just making sure, thanks :-)

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 19, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants